Killshot Caine
The Unstoppable Ledgernaut
You Just Mad Cuz i'm Stylin On you!
Posts: 5,732
|
Post by Killshot Caine on Jun 1, 2011 16:46:34 GMT -5
@crom So basically God is like Sentry.Robert Reynolds,The Void,and Sentry are all part of one being but they are separate
|
|
|
Post by Crom-Cruach on Jun 1, 2011 17:36:06 GMT -5
@crom So basically God is like Sentry.Robert Reynolds,The Void,and Sentry are all part of one being but they are separate I'm honestly not familiar with Sentry enough to use that as an analogy. But it boils down to this: God is in everything, everything is off God (made by Him and inside of Him). But God is also transcendent: everywhere and nowhere at the same time, part and separate from everything at the same time.
|
|
|
Post by Khaos King on Jun 8, 2011 22:58:47 GMT -5
Buddhas Mother was not a Virgin but Buddha was a divine birth as he was of immaculate conception.
4 deity guardians took his mother up to heaven where a large elephant with six tusk went into her symbolizing that the child would be a male.
|
|
|
Post by Phantom Stargrave on Jun 9, 2011 7:07:54 GMT -5
you know, that's not what immaculate conception is.
|
|
|
Post by Khaos King on Jun 9, 2011 11:10:52 GMT -5
you know, that's not what immaculate conception is. without sin or pure aka not sex.
|
|
|
Post by Phantom Stargrave on Jun 9, 2011 11:34:15 GMT -5
No. Immaculate conception is a purely Christian concept that deals not with Jesus's, but with Mary's conception. The idea is that Mary was conceived and born without the stain (macula) of the original sin. God prevented the the original sin to be transmitted from Mary's parents to Mary, thus having her be born sinless, and as such be fit to give birth to Jesus. But she was conceived the old fashioned way, and it most definitely included sex. Jesus' own conception, I believe is called incarnation.
|
|
|
Post by Khaos King on Jun 9, 2011 11:46:55 GMT -5
isnt that what i just said? close enough
thinking of an old image i saw online where the underlying post says, "a lie that got out of hand" with the Virgin Mary pregnant.
|
|
|
Post by Phantom Stargrave on Jun 9, 2011 12:18:18 GMT -5
isnt that what i just said? You said no sex. That's not it. It's also completely Christian concept. You can't use it on budhist or hinduist mythology because it deals only with the christian original sin.
|
|
|
Post by Khaos King on Jun 9, 2011 12:34:55 GMT -5
sigh,,,,
Immaculate means pure without sin. Sex is looked at as a sin, i said that Buddha was born without conventional Sex and used the term immaculate in that context.
Buddhism doesnt have a judeo christian concept of sin but the word is used sometimes to try and express an idea in terms others can understand.
no biggie...
|
|
|
Post by Phantom Stargrave on Jun 9, 2011 13:02:55 GMT -5
Immaculate means with the stain of the original sin That's important. It's not just any sin. It refers specifically to Adam and Eve's sin and its transmission through humanity.
Besides, sex isn't sin. Sex before marriage is sin. Sin in marriage is a perfectly acceptable and natural action.
And again, Mary was born through sex[. So immaculate conception cannot mean conception without sex.
|
|
|
Post by Khaos King on Jun 9, 2011 14:16:56 GMT -5
i agree that sex is not a sin but not all think so and view it as a sin.
the Virgin Mary was pure/immaculate/without blemish.
i guess in that context Buddha is not pure and immaculate.
I will say he was born with similar metaphysical interaction as was Yeshua.
|
|