|
Post by ckal on Mar 4, 2011 20:55:02 GMT -5
k4tz and I discuss the preview for upcoming Spider-Man content that was seen at the end of 'The Amazing Spider-Man #654.1'
What do you think this content preview reveals about the upcoming events for Spidey? Comment below, Legers!
|
|
|
Post by Erik-El on Mar 4, 2011 21:05:58 GMT -5
One of those guys is CABLE!!!!
Maybe that thing MJ whispered is finally coming to fruition? This time it is not going to be a giant F-U like Jackpot was.
|
|
|
Post by Dane on Mar 4, 2011 21:12:41 GMT -5
damn, sure hope it is Cable! Awesome video guys !
|
|
|
Post by ckal on Mar 4, 2011 21:15:28 GMT -5
I was wondering if it was Cable as well...purely for the fact that it is a man holding a ridiculously large gun.
Thanks Dane!
|
|
|
Post by Erik-El on Mar 4, 2011 21:20:13 GMT -5
That is my reasoning as well. Giant buff guy holding a laughably large gun. That says Cable like nothing else would. Or Bishop but the guy in the pic is not black so...
|
|
|
Post by ckal on Mar 4, 2011 21:25:34 GMT -5
Bishop retcon!
Lol.
|
|
|
Post by Erik-El on Mar 4, 2011 21:32:53 GMT -5
Lol.
|
|
|
Post by NexusOfLight on Mar 5, 2011 14:57:30 GMT -5
I'm thinkin' since it was Negative who essentially turned Brock into Anti-Venom, he's probably gonna find a way to use that against him. That blade sticking out of Brock's chest definitely looks like some negative kinda construct, so maybe he created that blade to kill him? I dunno.
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Mar 5, 2011 14:59:13 GMT -5
What do you guys think about our guess for the person in the lab next to him?
|
|
|
Post by Morpheus on Mar 5, 2011 15:07:16 GMT -5
Unfortunately, it isn't Connors. X-Men # 8 made sure of that.
|
|
|
Post by NexusOfLight on Mar 5, 2011 15:12:45 GMT -5
Doubt it would've been Connors anyway. It could be Max's lab. Did he show Peter where he worked? Can't remember.
|
|
|
Post by Morpheus on Mar 5, 2011 15:18:03 GMT -5
Also, despite me and K4tz cracking jokes about it, I do like Phil a good deal, but I think the image of him being close to kissing Nora may be misleading - with her getting so close to him for reasons of her own, only to double-cross him later, or because he has some advantage over her (holding hostages and threatening them and whatnot).
I do hope I'm wrong, and Nora does seem seductive, not upset in the pic, but I have a hard time believing she'll actually fall in love with him, particularly if she knows his identity.
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Mar 5, 2011 15:23:02 GMT -5
Exactly why I said he "might" be successful But yeah, I agree. Just because she's interested in the character for a stroy doesn't mean she's in love with him like he's her version of Superman to Lois Lane I think Phil is a bit too blind to realize that. Besides, she seems pretty head-over-heels for her current boyfriend.
|
|
|
Post by Morpheus on Mar 5, 2011 15:30:55 GMT -5
On her current boyfriend - I don't think she likes him nearly as much as you say. When Ben Urich asked her, her response was purely relying on her physical attraction to Randy, not any particularly heart-warming stuff (even though that could be attributed to her unconventional style), and she definitely doesn't seem to mind running around with Phil in favour of writing a good article as opposed to going out with him (Phil could have given her details later, her presence didn't really add much of anything to the stakeout). She also has no issues flirting with Pete, even in recent stories (Osborn).
See what you did to me with those Phil avatars of yours? I'm typing whole paragraphs to analyze Nora's relationship. Jesus.
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Mar 5, 2011 15:35:17 GMT -5
The avatar was never Phil, damn it! Well, head-over-heels about the physical side of the relationship, that's for sure. As for her running off in favor of a story, I just think that shows she's a career-oriented person, and the same would have happened regardless of who offered to take her to the story, IMHO. In the end, I think Phil is just going to get his hopes up, she'll reveal she has no attraction to him, and he goes Hobgob crazy
|
|
|
Post by Morpheus on Mar 5, 2011 15:41:35 GMT -5
One of them was, I checked.
I definitely agree she has an avid interest in her career and this particular article (Norman did get under her skin in American Son, so she likely takes it personally), but still, the indication is there that they have been doing so with Phil for quite a while, and she continuously neglects Randy because of it (and he is evidently annoyed by it).
Maybe we will get the original Black Cat/Spider-Man angle? Nora wanting Hobgoblin but not the man under the mask?
|
|
Painkiller
Team Buster Ledger
?I?m sorry, did I ruin your concentration??
Posts: 2,407
|
Post by Painkiller on Mar 6, 2011 0:19:09 GMT -5
The only bad thing I can say about this review is that K4tz called Sinister Six, the Secret Six once..which was hardly noticable anways.
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Mar 6, 2011 0:42:27 GMT -5
The only bad thing I can say about this review is that K4tz called Sinister Six, the Secret Six once..which was hardly noticable anways.
|
|
Painkiller
Team Buster Ledger
?I?m sorry, did I ruin your concentration??
Posts: 2,407
|
Post by Painkiller on Mar 6, 2011 5:47:12 GMT -5
Ha. It was only a minor slip up though...
|
|
|
Post by Morpheus on Mar 6, 2011 6:28:49 GMT -5
K4tz's baner was showing.
|
|