|
|
Post by Admin on Nov 16, 2010 10:03:07 GMT -5
It appears the director of Hellboy and Pan's Labyrinth will team up with Battlestar Galactica Executive Producer David Eick to create a brand new The Incredible Hulk TV series. But don't get ready for Hulk to smash through your TV anytime soon. The show isn't expected to hit the air until after Hulk's appearance in the 2012 Avengers movie. tv.ign.com/articles/113/1134716p1.htmlDel Toro has expressed interest in working with the character before, so what do you think? Will he be a good fit for the heavy hitter? |
|
|
|
Post by Morpheus on Nov 16, 2010 10:22:05 GMT -5
Eh, I wouldn't be surprised if the TV-series never makes it through.
As it is, it is a very distant prospect, and without any data, it is virtually impossible to tell if Del Toro will be up for it or not. But sure, in theory, his name is a step towards the right direction.
|
|
|
|
Post by Crom-Cruach on Nov 17, 2010 16:29:29 GMT -5
could be good Guillermo does great work
|
|
|
|
Post by Erik-El on Dec 8, 2010 16:36:34 GMT -5
When is the next Hulk movie slated to come out?
What is wrong with Edward Norton reprising the role? I thought he was amazing but have been told he will not be considered.
|
|
|
|
Post by Morpheus on Dec 8, 2010 16:43:09 GMT -5
When is the next Hulk movie slated to come out? What is wrong with Edward Norton reprising the role? I thought he was amazing but have been told he will not be considered. |
|
|
|
Post by Erik-El on Dec 8, 2010 16:46:37 GMT -5
When is the next Hulk movie slated to come out? What is wrong with Edward Norton reprising the role? I thought he was amazing but have been told he will not be considered. Does that mean he chose not to reprise his role or that his opinion cost him a sequel? |
|
|
|
Post by Morpheus on Dec 8, 2010 16:53:01 GMT -5
If memory serves right, Norton was disappointed that the studio cut down the running time of the film, omitting scenes he felt were crucial, in favour of a more action-packed approach. Does that mean he chose not to reprise his role or that his opinion cost him a sequel? |
|
|
|
Post by Erik-El on Dec 8, 2010 16:54:25 GMT -5
Does that mean he chose not to reprise his role or that his opinion cost him a sequel? Too bad. They could have met him half way and just gave an extended version. |
|
|
|
Post by Morpheus on Dec 8, 2010 17:02:39 GMT -5
Too bad. They could have met him half way and just gave an extended version. |
|
|
|
Post by Erik-El on Dec 8, 2010 17:03:57 GMT -5
Too bad. They could have met him half way and just gave an extended version. Wow. 35 minutes of crucial story is basically butchering the movie. It sounds like it would have been an entirely different movie experience had they included the missing footage. |
|
|
|
Post by Morpheus on Dec 8, 2010 17:11:24 GMT -5
Norton thought the film was supposed to be, approximately, 150 minutes long, and the studio basically cut over 35 minutes of content. I don't recall if Leterrier had any saying in that, though. Wow. 35 minutes of crucial story is basically butchering the movie. It sounds like it would have been an entirely different movie experience had they included the missing footage. |
|
